I saw this hit video on demand a few months back, but I never got around to watching it. It finally came on Amazon Prime so I gave it a try. The Blackwell Ghost is a "documentary" about a independent filmmaker who takes on a project to find out if ghosts are real or not. It's marketed as a real documentary; however, I have my doubts on things. Real or not, it was still entertaining and pretty creepy. Here's the trailer.

The documentary follows a man who says he used to film zombie films but wanted a change of pace. He comes across a YouTube clip of a ghost walking out of a hotel room and decides he wants to look into hauntings. Here is the clip of the ghost coming out of the hotel room. 

He tries to look into that but gets contacted by a guy who claims to live in a haunted house. The dude flies out there to meet the guy who owns the house and we get a bit of backstory on the residence. Basically, legend has it that back in the day the woman who lived there was a little crazy and kidnapped kids, chopped them up, and threw them down a well that was located in the cellar. The guy goes on to say that he experiences supernatural phenomenon almost every day in the way of noises, things moving, and other common haunting stuff. 

Later on, the filmmaker is invited by the owner to come back and spend a few nights in the house while he's away on vacation. The filmmaker takes the man up on his offer and craziness ensues. 

There aren't really any jump scares in this movie/documentary, but where it works is the slow build of tension that is executed in a practical way at the end that still manages to get under your skin. I question the authenticity of the documentary aspect, as some things happen in this that seem a little to coincidental and done for entertainment; however, it didn't detract from the experience. If you like quiet, slow building, ghost stories, check it out. It was only an hour well worth the time.

I finally was able to get out and see the movie, Hereditary, and oh my lord, what a weird and creepy movie. It is unsettling on many levels, and kind of sticks with you after you've seen it for a bit. First off, the trailer didn't do the movie any justice; however, after seeing the flick, I'm not sure how you can effectively cut a trailer for this movie. I'm going to tackle some non-spoilery stuff first, then we'll get into the meat and potatoes of this show.

First, let's talk about the story. On the surface, it's about a family dealing with the death of a mother/grandmother. Digging deeper and peeling away the layers, it's about so much more. This movie is about loss. Loss of family, loss of sanity, and loss of self. 

I have to give some major kudos to actor Toni Collette, she knocked this one out of the park. She shows a wide range of emotion and kept this story moving. Another big shout out to Molly Shapiro who played the daughter to Toni Collette. I think she portrayed having mental issues very well. The trailer made it seem like this movie was going to be about her, and in a way it was. But, as I mentioned before, the trailer is misleading.

Overall, this movie excelled in its creep factor. The way the angles were shot, the music, and the use of light (or lack thereof) all came together and made for some shots that actually sent chills through my body. There were some specific scenes too (which I'll get into in the spoiler section) that stuck with me  after the credits rolled. 

The movie starts out slow, but once it starts moving, it doesn't stop. ​One thing that I enjoyed, was the unreliable POV of Toni Collette's character. She suffers from some issues where you have to question if what she is seeing is real or not. It made me question everything she saw and that was great. I love movies that leave things up to the interpretation of the viewer. 

As for some of the cons of the movie, there are a few things that happen make me question the actions of the main characters...one of those things where they act a certain way and you just roll your eyes. It wasn't anything crazy, but enough to make me raise an eyebrow.

Another issue of the movie is some of it doesn't make sense. I'll get into it a bit in my spoiler section. Overall, these things didn't detract from the experience and if you're into weird, creepy things, then go watch the movie. It's hard to compare it to anything, but the closest thing I can think of is maybe The Witch. They play on the theme of isolation, strange things going on, and overall creepiness. Plus, Utah connection! The movie was filmed in Park City and Salt Lake City. I thought it was looking familiar while I was watching it, then I saw a Utah plate on a vehicle in a scene. 

​Anyway...on to the spoilers!  

Let's get into the spoilers. The trailer sets this movie up to be some sort of supernatural little girl scary movie, and I suppose on some level, yes, that is part of this movie. However, I almost thought this would take a turn much like The Omen or maybe Firestarter where the little girl was going to be the main character of this show and the family was going to be dealing with her powers. But HOLY SHIT, 1/3 of the way into this movie she gets taken out in a gruesome accident that takes her head off. So if you're sensitive to kids dying, don't see this movie. They end up showing her head later on the side of the road all decomposing and covered with ants.

All of sudden this movie took a turn and it started getting even weirder. There were some traditional witchcraft overtones early on that I saw that reminded me of the maiden, mother, and crone. The paganism angle gets heavier and heavier until it comes to an end. You come to find out that the grandmother was part of a coven that was trying summon Paimon who is a duke of hell or a king or hell depending on what source read.

I loved how they weaved mental disorders into actual paranormal happenings. At one point Toni Collette explains to a support group that her mother was crazy and that she had mental issues. She mention that her brother killed himself and blamed the mother stating that she put voices in his head. After seeing the show, we can see that she was trying to plant an evil demon into him. It makes me wonder if her issues stemmed from the same source, or if she actually had some issues. 

Here are some questions I have about the movie that perhaps someone smarter than me can answer. First, was Charlie really Paimon (a duke of hell that the grandmother was trying to summon and that the coven finally successfully summoned)? I don't quite understand how her spirit was connected to the whole thing.

Second, how do you not know that there is a dead body in your attic? That shit would start to stink something bad I would imagine. They make some cursory comment about it during the movie, but come on...I think it would be worse then that. 

Third, the family witnesses some strange seance go down and the next day they just move on like nothing happened. I mean, if I saw things go flying off the table, flames shooting out of candles, and my mom speaking in tongues, I don't know what I would do, but going on about my business like nothing at all was out of the ordinary would not be it.

Anyway, the scene when Toni Collette crawls up the wall and is banging her head against the crawlspace door was creepy as hell. Then when she's cutting her own head off with a wire...oh man, chills. Any time they showed a spirit in the darkness was very well done, especially the scene with the head and the ball (if you've seen it, you'll know what I'm talking about). 

Well worth a watch if you're into creepy stories. I highly recommend it.

I recently saw the movie, Happy Death Day. I went in with pretty low expectations but was pleasantly surprised. The story plays out much like the movie, Groundhog Day (in fact there is a nice little nod to Groundhog Day near the end of the show), where the main character relives the same day over and over. However, in this tale, the main character is killed at the end of the day by a masked assailant. Each time she dies, she wakes up in the same manner. This review will be spoiler free.

Right off the bat, the protagonist is pained in a certain light, showing the viewers that she's a shallow person with very little going for her other than good looks. She doesn't care about anyone other than herself, is mean to her roommate, and is trying to hoop up with the married professor. What's neat about this setup, is that we don't know who the killer could be, because 10 minutes in we've established half-a-dozen possible killers with motive.

The plot of the movie is that she needs to survive the night and find out who her killer is before it is too late because she doesn't have unlimited lives. Each day she wakes a little weaker implying that at some point, she'll cease to exist.

This movie has decent acting, and a well written story. Buried within the main arch is a sub-plot about the main character's relationship with her father that's both touching and heartbreaking...not something I expected to see in a slasher flick. The other nice part of this film, is it isn't gory. Not that I mind gore, but from the looks of the trailer I thought I was getting into a typical slasher movie in the same vein as Scream or I Know What you Did Last Tuesday When you Were at the Summer Cabin in the Woods. Most of the death scenes are implied, cutting away just as you would expect to see blood spraying from an artery. Plus, there is a lot of humor woven throughout the film. It livens it up when necessary, keeping the story moving along.

This film isn't without it's flaws. First and foremost, there was a weird gun scene that happened (TWICE) that really bugged me. There is a point where she gets a hold of the security guard's gun and empties it in three shots. Earlier, there was another scene where the gun was fired three times and then it was empty. The gun looked like a Berretta 92 which is capable of holding way more than three shots. So...what the hell over? 

Second, there were a lot of times that the killer was knocked down or stunned. Every time this occurred I heard Shang Tsung's voice from Mortal Kombat yelling, FINISH HIM! Instead, she runs around like a damned lunatic trying to figure out some way to freedom.  

Third, the school's mascot is the Baycock Babies. A baby. Really? I guess they needed a reason for the killer to be running around in this creepy baby mask, but come on...that is one of the most horrible mascots I've ever heard of.

Finally, I thought the killer's motive was pretty weak. I rolled my eyes during the explanation. It seemed a little forced, but whatever. All in all the flaws were minor and I walked away enjoying this movie quite a bit. If you get a chance to see it, I recommend you do so. I give this movie 3.5 repeated days out of five. 

It’s been a few days since I watched this movie and I still really don’t know what to think. It’s directed by Darren Aronofsky and he’s done some odd movies in the past. I remember watching Black Swan and thinking it was okay. I’m not entirely sure that I liked this one. This is going to be a long post, so strap in.

Going into it, I didn’t know what to expect other than it was an intense psychological thriller that was fairly polarizing with its audience. I knew it had to do with Jennifer Lawrence and Javier Bardem, Ed Harris, and Michelle Pfeiffer and had to do with unexpected guests showing up to Jennifer and Javier’s home.

This first section will be spoiler free; however, the second section will be packed with spoilers as I get into the meat and potatoes of the movie. I will warn you before we get there though.

The concept was enough to pique my interest. I’m a recluse and somewhat anti-social, to begin with. Unless it’s a group of close friends, I don’t really like going to social functions, so the idea of a bunch of rando’s showing up to my house is uncomfortable.

First off, let’s dig into the story. It starts off showing us a burning image of a young woman crying, and a burnt out house. Javier places a glowing crystal in a stand, and the house reverts back to its former glory and we pan over to Jennifer’s character waking up in bed and finding herself alone. Odd right? But a neat hook because now I want to know more. Is it something that happened before, is it a portent of what’s to come? It’s a good hook regardless.

Jennifer’s character is married to the older, Javier and you get the sense that they have moved out to the middle of nowhere in an old family estate of Javier’s. The house had suffered through a fire in which we learn Javier’s family had died. Jennifer is there to offer him support while he suffers through a bad case of writer’s block. Meanwhile, she has been singlehandedly renovating the house and breathing light back into the darkness. We learn through interactions that Javier is a renowned poet, but hasn’t written in years. Things seem hunky-dory, although Jennifer suffers from odd hallucinations from time to time where she hears glass ringing/chiming and can see the burnt out vestige of the house underplayed beneath her renovation work. Every time this happens, she races upstairs to the bathroom and mixes a yellow powder into a glass of water to quash the visions. We never know what this concoction is. We can assume it’s to help her stop hallucinating; however, there’s a point in the movie where she stops taking it and I didn’t’ see any ill effects from that decision.

At first, the movie almost had a Yellow Wallpaper feel to it. That short story by Charlotte Perkins Gilman is one of my absolute favorites. I noticed some similarities between the two, as the main character from the story and Jennifer’s character both seemed to see things that weren’t there and were steamrolled by their male counterparts. Javier does a good job of dismissing some of the things Jennifer does in the movie, and when the “guests” begin to arrive, they constantly defer to Javier with the gratitude and appreciation, almost to the point of ignoring Jennifer’s existence. This movie, like that story, very much play into the misogynistic prejudices against women.

I felt as if Jennifer’s efforts to restore the house were downplayed in the eyes of the supporting cast, and when she mentioned that she did it all herself, she was met with disbelief that a woman could do something that extravagant.

There was a definite theme of vanity and pride throughout the film. Javier does a great job losing himself in his own work and success, and near the end of the film, we see almost a complete transition with his character.
Where this movie struggled, was with the story. I never got a clear picture on what the movie was really about. What was the plot? It seemed to flounder in spots, and once it was over, I felt like the entire first half didn’t really play into the second half at all. This is probably one of the biggest issues I had with the film, was the lack of plot. Perhaps I missed the point.

The acting was strange as well. Hats off to Jennifer Lawrence, I thought she did an excellent job, and Javier Bardem did well also. However, I felt as if everyone else was exaggerating their characters to the point that it was almost comical to watch, Ed Harris especially, although I couldn’t’ tell if this was done on purpose or not.
Finally, this movie was chock full of Christian symbolism. I don’t want to get into details in this section (we’ll save it for the spoiler section), but it goes out of its way to hit you over the head (pun intended, you’ll see why later) with its symbolism. The only reason I couldn’t quite figure out, was why?

Don’t see this movie if you have issues with seeing children depicted on screen hurt. There is a scene near the end that is very difficult to watch (details forthcoming in the spoiler section).

Even after writing all this, I still don’t really know if I liked this movie. I give this movie two and a half WTF’s out of five.

​Here there be spoilers. Ye’ve been warned. Also, this section is basically going to be a synopsis of the movie. 

​Okay, let’s unpack this movie. As I mentioned above, there is a lot of Christian symbolism. Let’s start off with the movie posters. Jennifer is made up to look like the Virgin Mary and Javier is sitting on a throne of fire looking all sorts of the devil.

In the beginning, there was darkness, then there was light. The movie opens with this motif, with the darkness being the burnt up house. Slowly it changes from ash and rubble to a cozy little cottage in the middle of paradise. Everything moves from dark colors to contrasting brightness. It’s their own little Eden. However, it’s Ed Harris and his wife, Michelle Pfeiffer that portray Adam and Eve. And if that’ the case, we are to assume the Javier is playing as God, and Jennifer while playing his wife, is really there because she adores him, and will be the mother of his child. There are also some interesting dynamics between Javier and Jennifer. He shrugs off her advances early on, unwilling to show her physical affection. It isn’t until later in the movie where she lashes out at him that he takes her in an uncomfortable sex scene that starts off very rapey. 

Anyway, I digress…back to Adam and Eve, Ed and Michelle. They show up to paradise, and immediately shit goes south. Javier starts to spend more time with Ed than he does with Jennifer, and even helps him out by removing some sort of tumor from his lungs? I dunno…there was a weird scene where he’s coughing and puking in the toilet and Javier is helping him. Jennifer walks in on the two. Ed is naked and bleeding from his side and Javier quickly covers it and yells at her to give them some privacy. The next day, Jennifer is cleaning up in the bathroom and there is some weird tumor looking thing stuck in the toilet. I suppose this is to show Javier’s healing powers?

Moving on from that, Michelle, Ed’s wife arrives and she embodies the very opposite of Jennifer’s character. She’s sultry, drinks, and smokes. She’s pushy where Jennifer is meek. At one point, she wants to go to Javier’s den and see the weird crystal thing, but Jennifer tells her to stay out of there. She has to warn her numerous times. Later, there is a crash from the den and Javier and Jennifer race up there to find Ed and Michelle standing by the broken shards of the crystal. Javier loses his mind and kicks everyone out. Later he comes out, locks the door and breaks the doorknob off (this is important), and then boards up his den stating that no one will get in there now. We just saw the comparison of Eve eating the apple and the both of them getting kicked out of Eden.

The next major scene that takes place, is when Ed and Michelle’s two sons arrive, bickering about their father’s will. A fight ensues and one of the sons picks up the discarded doorknob and caves in the other’s skull using the Cain and Abel finishing move. During the fight, the attacking brother’s forehead is injured and marked in the same way Cain’s is after killing his brother. Javier, Ed, and Michelle rush the man to the hospital leaving Jennifer behind to clean up the mess. And the Cain stand in rushes off into the wilderness.

It’s during this time where she is alone that we begin to see other things unravel. Up to this point, she had made some trips to the basement, but she ends up going down again and we really see some interesting comparisons. The basement is where the furnace is and I believe the representation of hell with its fire and brimstone (I know, hell isn’t always represented in such a way, but in this movie, I think it is). She’s cleaning up when the other brother returns to get his wallet that he lost during the altercation and he’s amazed that they left her behind. He can see what she means (or doesn’t) to Javier and wishes her the best of luck before departing. It’s at that time that Javier returns covered in blood and could really care less what happened to Jennifer, he’s more intent on telling her what happened to him. When she tries to tell him everything, he says he’s dirty and exhausted and wants to take a shower before going to bed. He invites her up, but she wants to finish one thing first. When she gets up there, Javier is already asleep.

Then, Ed and Michelle come back, and they have friends and family in tow. They are all dressed up nice for a funeral. Javier tells Jennifer that he invited them over to destress and have a place to hold a wake for the dearly departed. Jennifer doesn’t know what to make of it as guests continue to arrive in such a way that it reminded both my wife and me of the scene from the Hobbit where all the dwarves keep showing up at Bilbo Baggins’ home. The difference between the two was that the dwarves actually cleaned up after themselves and didn’t break anything, whereas the guests have no care whatsoever for Jennifer’s paradise and only care for themselves. In this scene, we get see Javier eating up being the center of attention when he gets to say a few words about the departed. We really see him revel in the wonder and awe that people throw his way while not caring at all about what Jennifer’s character is feeling. We also see a lot of reference between Sodom and Gomorra as the guests become more and more irreverent, sneaking off to bump the uglies, and guests even approaching her to fornicate and make merry (although the offer comes in a very forward, and disgusting manner). 

Finally, after asking folks several times not to sit on a sink because it hadn’t been braced yet, they sit on it and it breaks, flooding the house. This is the great flood that God sent to cleanse the world, and it’s the same in this movie. It isn’t until the flood that the people get the hell out of Dodge. After they leave, Jennifer confronts Javier about what happened and their life in general. They get into a heated debate and she says the reason they don’t have any children is because he won’t get it on with her. He takes that as a challenge and we get our rapey/love-making scene that’s about as uncomfortable as the rest of the movie has been. Afterward, she says she’s pregnant. Javier gets his inspiration back and begins to feverishly write again. We get a scene of her dumping the odd golden powder concoction that suppressed her hallucinations down the toilet, and we flash forward.

The next time we see her, she’s about ready to pop and the house is completely renovated. She’s putting the finishing touches on in the nursery and Javier appears saying he’s finished his poem. She reads it with tears in her eyes and confirms is a masterpiece and that it’s perfect. Next thing we know, we have a call from his editor (almost immediately) saying she loves it and it’s going to be huge. To celebrate, Jennifer makes a nice, candlelit dinner for the both of them, but before we can get to eating, more guests arrive. Fans of Javier’s come to see him and ask him about his writing. Instead of kicking them out, he embraces them, much to her dismay.

This is when shit goes from what the hell to dafuq quick. The crowd grows and grows, forcing their way inside. They set up a signing station for him to sign books. People shove themselves inside and soon they begin to take. They take anything they can, even ripping up boards because they want a piece of something that belonged to Javier. Things get violent and nasty. Then, the next thing we know, we’re seeing flashes from different places. Jennifer is standing next to some sex slave prison in Eastern Europe, then we’re in a war zone and people are dying in a hail of explosions and gunfire. The crowd is growing bigger and getting crazier, turning into a cult worshiping Javier, idolizing him. Jennifer is going into labor and fighting with the crowd at the same time. When all seems lost, Javier finds her and rushes her back to his boarded up den so she can give birth. Once she gives birth, the crowd outside grows quiet. Javier goes to see what’s up and finds that they have brought the baby gifts and are waiting to see him. We’ve just seen the birth of the son of god, and they are showering him with gifts just in the bible.

Jennifer has caught on to Javier’s bullshit now though and refuses to give the baby up. He wants to take the baby and show the crowd his creation. It becomes a battle of wills. He sits in a chair staring at her as she sits on the floor with the baby. Soon, exhaustion kicks in and the next she knows, is she’s awakening to find him with the baby walking out to the crowd.

This is where it gets very disturbing. She rushes after the child, but when she catches up to Javier, the crowd already has the baby. They are crowd-surfing the infant around like he’s a giant beach ball at a Smashmouth concert. Then, because the child’s head isn’t supported, its neck snaps. Jennifer rushes through the crowd demanding that they give her the baby back, sobbing with real emotion (props to Jennifer Lawrence again, her acting was superb). When she finally breaks through, her baby is gone, its body mutilated by the cult. People are eating bits of the child, ingesting it like it’s the body of Christ. She flips out and starts stabbing folks with a shard of glass and kills a few before they lay the smackdown on her. For a moment it looks like they are about to beat her to death and desecrate her body when Javier shows up and shields her. He says they are sorry for killing his son, and all they want is to be forgiven (hitting us over the head with more religious symbolism). He says that they need to find a way to forgive them so that his son’s death wouldn’t be in vain.

Jennifer has had enough and breaks free, racing back down to Hell, eh…I mean the basement where she breaks open a big gas/oil tank. Javier tries to stop her saying he loves her, but she’s seen through all his lies and states that he doesn’t love her, that he only loves that she loves him. She lights the place up and it blows, killing everyone and burning the house down.

After you see Javier walking through the rubble relatively unscathed. He picks Jennifer up and carries her to bed. In the end, she confesses that she still loves him, and he needs her sacrifice and love to start anew. She agrees and he plucks her heart out and turns it into the same crystal we saw before. When he places it up on the mantle, the house renews and there is a new woman in his bed: the cycle starts again.
​
Final thoughts.
To wrap up this journey, I really think the theme of this movie is about love and sacrifice in the name of God. I got the feeling that Aronofsky isn’t a big fan of religion and used his story as a metaphor to show how much craziness happens in the name of God. I also feel like Aronofsky perhaps sees God in a negative light with not giving and only taking. However, I like to think that Javier was playing Lucifer trying to recreate what God had made and failing miserably every time. I find that story more interesting. I’m not a religious person at all, but I still failed to find what the movie was really about (talking plot here). But, as I mentioned before, perhaps I missed the point. Was this movie a horror? Sure was. Was it disturbing? On many different levels. Will I watch it again? No. 

I recently watched the newest adaptation of Stephen King’s, It, directed by Andy Muschietti. Overall, I enjoyed. It was well done, and while it didn’t completely follow the source material, I think that the changes didn’t hurt the story at all, in fact, in some ways, I would dare say it made the story better. I’ll get into a spoiler section later, but for now this will be spoiler free.

First off, the movie is set in the 80’s, which for me, works. However, I will say this, it gave me a heavy Stranger Things vibe. Mainly because Finn Wolfhard was in it and played the part of Richie Tozier. Plus, on top of that, the town of Derry looked a lot like the town of Hawkins. On the surface, Derry feels like any sleepy town; however, there’s something floating in the background, something that wakes every few decades to feed. I’ve always loved the concept of It and what it does. Speaking of background, this is a movie to pay close attention to the background. There are small things going on that add to the depth and flavor of the movie. For example, keep an eye on the television when Beverly walks through her house. Another great background Easter egg what the name of the pharmacist. In the original made-for-tv movie, the pharmacist's name was Koontz, a nod to Dean Koontz. In this new version, his name is Keene, a nod to Brian Keene, a modern horror author.

There was a part in the movie where the background was creepy as hell, and I have no idea if it was intentional or not. It’s when Ben is in the library, shortly after the librarian gives him a book on the town’s history and tells him he should be outside playing. As he’s looking at the book, the camera pans out so you can see him reading, and it looks like the librarian or someone similar is standing the background grinning at Ben. Watch it and let me know what you think.

I thought that Muschietti did an excellent job with the feel of this iteration of It. The movie gave a nod to the original adaptation while still having its own vibe. There were also times that felt almost like a nod to the Evil Dead franchise, especially the scene with Beverly in the bathroom and with the leper attacking Eddie.

Another great part of the movie (as pointed out by my lovely wife), was the layering of real monsters vs. supernatural monsters. For example, Beverly’s dad and Eddie’s mother are both prime examples of real monsters, people who abuse their children. There are some moments in this film where they are way scarier than Pennywise. The bullies are also frightening, mainly due to the fact that they have been left unchecked (apparently by the power that Pennywise has over the town, making people ignore or look the other way at the bad things happening). Generally, bullies will scare or rough someone up, but I tend to believe that the majority of them would stop short at trying to actually kill someone.

I also liked how Pennywise did his best to separate the kids whenever they were together. I won’t get into details, but it shows how together they were strong, but separate they were easy prey.

The movie had faults though. I thought the editing near the end fell short. At one point one of the kids is suddenly in a different part of the sewers. There was no lead up to it, nor any explanation. A simple edit showing It leading him away would have sufficed.

There was another point in the movie where the kids find the shoe of a missing girl in the sewer…THEN NOTHING EVER COMES FROM THAT! It bugged me for the rest of the film. I mean, it would have been neat to see them take the shoe to the police, and then have the police (obviously under the influence of Pennywise) wave it off like it was nothing, or that they didn’t believe them. It would have added another layer as well as closed that loop.

Another fault was some bad CGI in the beginning of the movie. The opening scene with Georgie is way more brutal than in the made-for-tv show, but part of it was destroyed when Pennywise opens his mouth and his teeth grow. It didn’t look finished and took me out of the story.
​
This leads me into another point, seeing the monster. In this movie, and story, we see Pennywise almost right off the bat. On one hand, I suppose it takes away some of the fear of the monster. Monster movies in general work better when the viewer never gets a full view of the creature, as we tend to fill in the blanks ourselves and fear of the unknown is powerful. On the other hand, this isn’t a traditional monster movie, and we need to see Pennywise. I did miss Tim Curry playing Pennywise; however, Bill Skarsgard does an excellent job bringing the dancing clown to life. He did great with the movements and general attitude.

I give it three and a half red floating balloons out of five. Definitely worth a watch.
​
Now, on to the spoiler parts…only go forward if you don’t care, or if you’ve seen the movie. You’ve been warned.

I liked Pennywise’s lair much better in this one. The pile of children’s things an all the floating children made a lot more sense than the spider’s lair in the original adaptation. Makes more sense when Pennywise says, “you’ll float too.” Also, I liked how the kids pretty much put the beat down on Pennywise. It works way better than a single slingshot of silver to the head, it also shows how strong the kids are working together.
​
That’s about it for spoilers, go see the movie. I can’t wait for the next one.

I want to talk about the movie, It Comes at Night. Released June 9th, 2017 and directed by Trey Edward Shults, the movie is about a family dealing with a post-apocalyptic survival situation. The official synopsis reads as follows:

Secure within a desolate home as an unnatural threat terrorizes the world, the tenuous order a man (Joel Edgerton) has established with his wife and son is put to the ultimate test with the arrival of a desperate family seeking refuge. Despite the best intentions of both families, paranoia and mistrust boil over as the horrors outside creep ever-closer, awakening something hidden and monstrous within the man as he learns that the protection of his family comes at the cost of his soul.

I’ll get into a detailed review which will contain some spoilers a little later. You’re safe to keep reading for now, and I’ll warn you before the spoilers arrive.

First and foremost, I thought this movie was excellent. It’s everything I’ve come to love about slow-burn, psychological thrillers. Even more, it really plays upon the concepts of the unknown as well as trust (or mistrust).
​
As the synopsis said, it takes place in a desolate home built deep in the woods. The movie opens with husband and son killing the son’s grandfather because he’s become ill with a horrible disease. The disease is part of the problem plaguing the world, because the family takes precautions to always have gas masks and heavy rubber gloves on whenever they interact with the outside world.

Right off the bat we know a few things. One, there is a horrible disease out there that can kill fairly quickly (days). Two, the disease is highly contagious as we can tell by the way the family interacts with the sickened grandfather. Three, they have to burn the body.

The tension and dread continues to increase as you see the family secure themselves back into the house at night. The windows are all boarded up, and there is only one entrance/exit into the house. With them as well, is a family dog that acts as an alarm whenever anything is near.
​
The shit hits the fan when a man breaks into the house looking for supplies. You learn the man was scavenging for his wife and young son who he left at an abandoned house some miles away. They are running out of water and will die soon without any help. Long story short, the two families decide to help one another, and they all join forces in the rural homestead.

What happens next can only be best described as a slow descent into distrust, tension, and desperate acts. The movie begs the questions: how far are you willing to go to save your loved ones; what happens when two men, willing to do anything to save their families collide; and what’s out in the woods? You’ll have to watch to find out.

Here’s a fair warning, this movie doesn’t hand you everything on a silver platter, and it will leave some questions unanswered or up to viewer interpretation. If you’re someone who can’t stand not knowing for sure what happened, then this probably isn’t the movie for you.

I give it a 4/5 stars.
​
Now…onto the spoiler section. You’ve been warned.

As I mentioned earlier, this movie doesn’t answer everything. For example, you never know what is out in the woods. It could be more people looking to take what others have amassed, or it could be something even more horrific. The family has a teenage son who is struggling with his identity and his hormones. He is also struggling with disturbing dreams. The dreams in this movie are important, and here is why I think so.

Early on, the boy’s grandfather dies when they drag his body outside, shoot him in the head, then burn the body. The movie never tells you why they burn body, so we are left to wonder if it is to stop the spread of the disease, or if it is to maybe stop the dead from coming back. There’s another scene with the man burning the bodies of a couple of dead highway who he had to kill.
​
The boy dreams about his grandfather after his death, and sees him as thing with all-black eyes and a bloody mouth. It could be post-traumatic stress manifesting, or it could be something else. I like to think his dreams are almost prophetic, and here’s why.

At one point, the boy’s dog runs off into the woods chasing after something. We never see what that is. However, that night, the dog returns to the house and is found by the boy’s father in the entry room. The dog looks like it had been gutted and is bleeding out, still alive…so it’s not sick. Something attacked it. He lies to boy, not letting him look at the dog in such a state, and says it’s really sick. The man kills it with a shot to the head and burns the body much in the same manner as the grandfather. Here’s the main reason why I think the boy’s dreams are more than just dreams. Before the dog arrives all tore up, the boy dreams of walking through the woods trying to find his dog. We can hear the dog barking off screen, and as he comes up to it, we hear it start whelping in pain in a violent/horrible manner. We never see what he sees (which, in my opinion, is more effective). Did he dream of what happened?

We also see some of the boy’s drawings, one of which depicts two shadowy figures with black eyes crawling through the woods. I think this hints towards the possibility that the disease changes folks into deadly creatures, and that’s what is out there, hence the reason to burn the bodies.

After the dog incident, there is suspicion that the other family’s child had gotten too close to the dead dog, because when they found the dog, the front door was already open. This raises the suspicion that perhaps the child may be infected, so, as a precaution, the families separate and quarantine themselves into separate rooms until the threat of disease has passed (in this story, the disease can manifest symptoms as early as a day).

At some point the second family tries to leave. We are led to suspect that perhaps the boy is sick. The original family knows they can’t let them go, because the family knows too much about the location of the house, what’s here, plus they are afraid that the family will want to take too much with them. A confrontation ensues resulting in the death of the second family to include the child. The child was only four or five, so it was hard to watch being a father myself. You never see any details, but it was still effective, more so if I’m being totally honest. Yet the movie never confirms whether or not the child had the disease, we never see proof.
​
In my opinion, this tactic was way more effective, as it will drive multiple versions of the story depending on who is watching it. There is a lot more going on in this film than I have put down in this review, but if you like slow-burn horror that doesn’t rely on gore and jump scares (there were a couple), then this is the show for you. See it.

I recently watched a film called, Savageland directed by Phil Guidry, Simon Herbert, and David Whelan. The synopsis is: A small border town on the Arizona-Mexico border is wiped out, and suspicion falls on the lone survivor. It’s only 1 hour and 20 minutes long and is filmed to play out like it’s a documentary on the event.
 
It starts out kind of slow and in the typical fashion of a documentary. Overnight, all the residents of the small town are killed or end up missing. The only survivor is an illegal immigrant who is found on the highway alone and covered in the blood several of the townspeople. In the beginning, it seems like a fairly cut-and-dry case; however, the person who “made” the documentary and did the investigating didn’t think so and starts to dig deeper. It’s through this investigation that we find out more, and things start to get creepy, especially when they show the photos the lone survivor had taken.
  
During the investigation, the journalist and his associate, a retired Border Patrol agent, breakdown the crime scene and activity as it occurred according to evidence, police reports, and what they found on a roll of camera film from the survivor. The police story starts to unravel and the photos show some very chilling scenes. Whoever they had taking the pictures and manipulating them for this movie is really talented. They are raw, well-done, and creepy as hell.
 
I’m not going to spoil the movie for anyone, but I highly suggest you go watch it if you like horror movies. There is a great subplot happening throughout, explaining why the survivor went through the town as he did instead of just running away. Just keep in mind that this isn’t a typical movie. You have to watch it with the mindset that it is a documentary or a mockumentary. Overall, I give it 3/5 stars.
 
Pros: The movie is unique with a fun twist and a great use of film. The photos add so much to the story that it’s worth it just for the pictures alone. Couple it with the sub-plot, and some of the other evidence introduced, and it’s a wonderful spectacle to watch.
 
Cons: The conclusion that the journalist comes to at the end as to what he thinks is really happening is kind of lame and unbelievable. With that much evidence put forward, I just can’t get behind his half-assed explanation. Also, I can’t believe the police would be so quick to pin it all on the survivor, there was just too much evidence even without the photos to pass anyone’s giggle check.
 
Overall: Check this movie out and enjoy the ride. 

​If you haven’t seen this plastered everywhere on Netflix, then I don’t know what to say. Spectral released on 9 December 2016 as a Netflix Original movie. It’s directed by Nic Mathieu and stars Clayne Crawford, Emily Mortimer, and James Badge Dale to name a few. The short blurb for the movie according to IMDB is, A sci-fi/thriller story centered on a special-ops team that is dispatched to fight supernatural beings. On the surface, sure; however, the story is obviously deeper than that and a bit different. 

Like my other movie review posts, I’ll get into some spoilers a little later; however, sit back and enjoy this spoiler-free review. First off, this movie is actually pretty dang good. I was impressed with the special effects, the acting, and the story itself. When I watched the trailer I thought, okay, this could really go either way and I expected it to be a hot mess. However, after watching it I can say that it was impressive. Was it the most amazing thing I’ve watched all year? Not at all, but if you like action, sci-fi, or supernatural thrillers then do yourself a favor and watch this.

The blurb is a little misleading. First off, the special-ops team isn’t dispatched to fight supernatural beings. The spec-ops bubbas are already in the country of Moldova fighting against an insurgency for whatever blah-blah reason (doesn’t matter). They are all equipped with a high-tech set of goggles that are supposed to feed them information about their surroundings kind of like a HUD (Heads Up Display) you would see in a first-person shooter video game. As the spec-ops dudes are conducting their operations, they are picking up odd anomalies in their displays, fuzzy images that seem to move of their own accord, which then subsequently attack them, killing the operators instantly upon touch.

The lead engineer of the specialized goggles is called to the front lines to give his opinion on what’s happening. Things go from bad to worse as the “anomalies” become more aggressive and begin to spread throughout the city, attacking friend and foe alike.
​
The entire first half of the movie felt very reminiscent of Aliens. You had your specialist (the lead engineer = Sigourney Weaver’s character), your battle-hardened military unit (spec-ops bubbas = Colonial Space Marines), your company rep (in this case a CIA Agent = the Weyland Yutani Company Man), and even armored assault vehicles. They move in, get their ass handed to them, and even run into a Newt equivalent. I halfway expected one of the spec-ops dudes to say that they would have to nuke it from orbit. 

Now don’t get me wrong, this isn't’ a bad thing. I love the movie, Aliens. It’s one of my favorites, so to have something conjure up that feeling was a good thing. Things take a turn as the movie moves forward, even bringing about an interesting twist at the end. Overall, I’d give this movie a 3.5/5.

​Now, onto the spoiler review…

If you haven’t watched this movie yet, please do before delving into this portion of my review. As I mentioned above, it’s a good flick and it deserves a watch.

I enjoyed the twist. Leading all the way up to the climax, the movie feeds you enough information to make you think that the anomalies are really angry spirits of the dead. They even threw in a fun effect of iron slowing them down. It made me think back to different lore I’ve read and seen about spirits being harmed by iron. There is a great scene where the spec-ops team is hiding out in an abandoned factory which is ringed by a line of iron shavings. The anomalies try to move past it, but get stuck and are unable to pass.

Where the movie begins to lose me, is near the end, where the lead engineer guy figures out that the anomalies aren’t spirits, rather some sort of man-made energy (i.e. a man-made weapon…which again harkens back to Aliens because the aliens are supposed to be a weapon that got out of hand). They track down the source of the things and then we get into a montage of the lead engineer and everyone rigging up energy weapons to fight them with “whatever was scavenged at the base.” The weapons he “rigs” up look pretty damn professional, they all look the same, and they all function perfectly. They don’t even test the weapons before they go head-to-head with the energy creatures. I kind of had to roll my eyes at that part and just go along with everything.

Turns out that the anomalies were made as weapons, but it begs the question, how did the opposition plan on utilizing them? It didn’t seem like there was any way to control them on the battlefield. In fact, they broke out and started killing everyone. I get the whole symbolism of creating a super weapon and then dealing with the consequences of your actions…but I can’t imagine that they would have been so careless. Perhaps I missed something.
​
I also thought the fact that they had to harvest real people to make each weapon was kind of interesting. In a way, they really were ghosts or spirits. The craziness of the ending aside, it was still a good flick. Check it out if you have a couple hours to spare. 

​I recently had the joy of watching The Arrival at my local movie theater. I had an idea of what it was about and heard good things from trusted sources, so I went in with high hopes and left not disappointed at all. The movie is directed by Denis Villeneuve and stars, Amy Adams, Jeremy Renner, and Forest Whitaker to name a few.
 
I’m familiar with a couple of Villeneuve’s other movies, like Prisoners and Sicario, both of which I thought were okay flicks. However, from the movies of his that I’ve seen so far, I believe The Arrival is the best. The movie is based on Ted Chiang’s short story, “Story of Your Life.” I want to read the story when I get a chance and see how the movie stacks up to the written page.
 
The basic premise of the movie is that alien spacecraft land in 12 different spots around the globe. With no real way of communicating with the aliens, the United States Military enlists the aid of Louise Banks (Amy Adams) who is a linguistics professor. The tension begins to mount as the world’s nations start to diverge on how to deal with the aliens, also called heptapods because they have seven limbs, bringing to the world to brink of war.
 
This movie, while epic in some proportions is kind of a slow burn (which is good). It’s also one of those movies that you have to pay attention to or you might miss something. I’ll do a spoiler review below (don’t worry, I’ll give ample warning) but know that there’s a fun twist at the end and it’s one of those movies that would be great to watch at least twice. Once to be surprised, and once again to see how everything is connected.
 
Working with Amy Adams, is Jeremy Renner who plays Ian Donnelly, a theoretical physicist. While they clash in some ways, they quickly learn how to work together and form an effective team. The biggest challenge they face, which forms the plot of the story, is that they have to break through the communication barrier before time runs out.
 

As a linguist myself, I got a real kick out of how language was presented in this movie. In one scene that stands out, Forest Whitaker, who plays an Army Colonel, presses Amy Adams to get results and gives her hell for starting out with basics like hello, names and pronouns. Adams comes back with this little gem (I’m paraphrasing because I don’t remember it all exactly): “You want to get to this point: What is your purpose here? First, we have to establish the concept of a question. Then we have to establish ‘you’, and differentiate between the singular ‘you’ and the collective ‘you’ because perhaps they don’t act as individuals. Then we have to get them to understand the concept of what/why, because perhaps they don’t even question things in their culture and the concept of why doesn’t even exist.”
 
There was also a scene where they figure out that the Chinese are trying to break the communication barrier with the aliens by using Mahjong. Adams goes on to explain why this would change the frame of understanding by stating: “Imagine if we used chess. Our whole basis of communication would be based on victory and/or defeat.” It’s the little gems like these that made me smile and goes to show how important language is, and how unique it is to the culture it resides with. It’s also this concept that leads us into the spoiler territory. However, before I delve into the cave, I want to leave this little bit with the non-spoiler crew. If you are interested in aliens, linguistics, or good movies, do yourself a favor and see this show. Heck, even if you’re an H.P. Lovecraft buff, go see it. I’m not the first to point this out, but there are some Lovecraftian themes subtly weaved into this movie. I give it 4 out of 5 heptapods.
 

​Now, into the spoiler realm…as I mentioned above, culture can influence language, and as the movie points out, language can also influence how one views things. As the movie plays out, the scientists/professors are gaining a little bit of ground with communicating with the aliens. Throughout the show, Amy Adams is wracked with flashbacks of her daughter who died of a rare disease that didn’t have a cure. As the movie plays out, we find out that these aren’t flashbacks at all, but flash forwards. Apparently the heptapods don’t see time as we do and as Adams learns more and more of their language, it begins to shape how she interprets time.
 
As the story progresses, the unity of the 12 nations that are interacting with the heptapods begins to collapse. They all get different interpretations of a message from the aliens that reads as: use weapon, or give weapon. This starts the countdown as the 12 different countries try to figure out what it means with China taking an aggressive stance by threatening to take military action. In the twilight hour, Adams finally figures out that she is seeing into the future, realizing that her daughter and the death of her daughter hasn’t occurred yet, also realizing that the father of that child is Renner’s character. It’s about this time that Adams finds out that the “weapon” is their language, which will allow them to see time as they do. The aliens also mention that in 3000 years, they will need humanity’s help, which is why they are bestowing this gift to them.
 
She gets a vision on how to stop the attack on the aliens by calling the Chinese military commander. This is where things get a little hokey for me. One, in her vision, she’s at a dinner gala and meets the Chinese general who basically lays everything out on a plate for her on what she has to do such as, gives her his personal cell number, what his wife told him on his death bed, etc…he seems to know that giving her this information is important. My problem with this, is that how would the Chinese general know to do this? Does he see into the future as well? It just seems a little too convenient to me. Anyway, long story short, she saves the day and they all avoid global warfare…or even planetary warfare (for now…who knows what will happen in 3000 years when the heptapods need their help).
 
At the end, Adams and Renner are hugging and she has the knowledge of what is to come. She basically asks Renner, “If you could see your whole life laid out in front of you, would you change things?” In short, asking if he knew about their unborn daughter and what would happen, would he still choose to give birth to her? It’s a deep question, and really drives home what the movie is about…choice. That question lingered with me on the drive home from the theater. On one hand, you would miss out on ever having had any of those experiences or given life to another human being at all. On the other hand, you know that life is going to be cut short. Thinking to the love and bond I share with my daughters, it’s a heavy question. I know what the answer is.
 
But the real question is…what’s going to happen in 3000 years?

I recently watched the movie, Ouija: Origin of Evil and I have to say I was pleasantly surprised. It’s not perfect, mind you, but it had a number of interesting elements that spoke to something buried deep down in the dark recesses of my mind. I’ll set the scene first, then we’ll get into the review.
 
The movie is set in the ‘60’s in Los Angeles and centers on a widowed woman and her two daughters. The mother plays as a medium, offering to channel spirits for those willing to pay a price. However, the whole thing is a hoax with the woman enlisting the aid of her two daughters to help with certain effects in order to convince the suckers...er…clients, that what is happening is real.
 
The father died in an apparent car accident and all the family members deal with his death in different ways. The youngest daughter prays to him every night in a conversationalist tone, the mother keeps everything stuffed down deep and withdraws from religion, and the oldest daughter rebels in the most cliché of teen ways: sneaking out, drinking, etc…
 
It’s the oldest daughter's rebellion that leads us to the titular set piece of the story, the Ouija board. While sneaking out one night, her friends play with an Ouija board and nothing happens. The girls get busted and the teen daughter has to take the awkward ride home with the mom and we get some exposition, during which the teen says, hey, you should get an Ouija board for the business.
 
Of course the mother does, otherwise, this would be a fairly lame Ouija board movie with no real Ouija board. This is where things start to get a little interesting. The first time the mom starts using the board the youngest daughter who is upstairs and in a completely different room at the time goes into a trance and begins answering all the questions the mother asks.
 
The movie starts to ramp up and the little girl begins to use the board more and more, even by herself. She begins  to show some true ability and even channels what appears to be the father (however, any horror movie critic worth his/her salt will know that this is utter bullshit).
 
Things ramp when the girl gets more and more addicted to using the board thinking she’s talking to her father. Strange things start happening in the house which I think are included just for bullshit jump scare factor (more on that later). Lo, and behold the girls go to a catholic school, which is where we meet their principal who happens to be a priest. It’s when he comes over that things really pick up and get awesome. I don’t want to spoil it too much, but it has an Evil Dead feel without the campiness.

​First, let’s get through some of the bad points of the film and then I’ll end it with the high points. Jump scares are bullshit. I understand why they are included in horror movies, but they are cheap. This movie was chock full of jump scares, many of which didn’t really do anything to move the plot forward. Second, the movie is somewhat predictable. I pretty much knew when things were going to happen before they would, to include parts that were supposed to be surprises. It could be due to the fact that I’ve been inundated with horror since a young age, but come on, Hollywood, let’s think outside the box. Third, the first 2/3rds of this movie are kind of slow. It takes awhile to really get moving, but when it does, oh man, does it get moving. Fourth, there are some things explained near the end by the priest that feel a little too much like a bad info-dump, and a little too convenient. Apparently, the little girl writes some stuff down while possessed by one of the spirits, and writes it all in Polish (not a spoiler, that part is in the trailer). There just so happens to be a nun at the school that is from Poland and also knows some backstory as to what’s happening. I won’t spoil it, but I did roll my eyes at that part.

​Which brings us to the good points of the film. The last 3rd of the movie is awesome. It’s dark and creepy. They do some things in this movie that talk to the little dark creature in my body that helps me write horror. I even felt like it was an alternate universe me writing an Ouija board movie for a moment. They play around a lot with extra-wide grins and mouths and off-color eyes which are almost a staple of any of my horror stories. I also felt like the writers kind of knew some of the bad cliches that occur (i.e. not sending away other people to try and keep them from danger, not splitting up, etc…) and actually addressed them in the story. At one point the mother is trying to send her older daughter out of the house to keep her safe and the daughter responds by saying, “that’s my sister down there and I’m not leaving her.” Might not be the best explanation or reason, but at least they had a reason to not send her away. Near the end of the movie, keep your eyes on the background. This movie is similar to Insidious where a lot of the creepy stuff happens in the background. I love it when a movie does that because it’s subtle but effective. 

Overall, this was an entertaining movie and worth a watch. I liked a lot of the stylistic elements in the film and it’s one of the better horror movies to come out in a while. Is it amazing? No. But it was good. I give 3 1/2 out of 5 planchettes.